Ethical Investment Policy Implementation
Alameda County, California
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Ethical Investment Policy Implementation→At a glance
- Public comments
- 10
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 13, 2026.
Public comments (10)
Urged the board to rescind delays and immediately implement the ethical investment policy.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 6:18 →Supported the ethical investment policy and criticized delays following Treasury Oversight Committee review.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 8:12 →Called for the immediate adoption and implementation of the ethical investment policy.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 10:26 →Expressed concern over the ethical investment policy and asked for transparency regarding prior meeting conditions.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 13:36 →Warned that investment restrictions would negatively impact county returns and fund balances.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 15:11 →Praised the treasurer's integrity and urged implementation of ethical investing standards.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 17:12 →Supported the ethical investment policy and questioned the rationale for further consultant reviews.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 19:30 →Argued that ethical investing does not harm financial returns and urged immediate action.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 25:04 →Applauded the treasurer and called for immediate implementation of the ethical investment policy.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 27:14 →Urged the board to reject outside lobbying pressure and implement the ethical investment policy.
Regular Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 29:29 →