Automated License Plate Readers and Data Privacy

Urged the board to reject the Flock Safety contract extension, citing data privacy risks and alleged violations of state law regarding data sharing.

Expressed strong opposition to the Flock Safety contract, stating that automated surveillance tools are used by federal immigration agents to conduct raids.

Called on the board to terminate the Flock contract, remove existing cameras, and avoid expanding mass surveillance.

Spoke in strong support of the Flock Safety contract extension, emphasizing its importance in fighting crime and supporting law enforcement.

Opposed the Flock contract extension, noting that networked camera data lacks security and can be accessed by various outside entities.

Urged the board to vote against the Flock contract and turn off the cameras to protect community values.

Noted that multiple cities across the country have canceled their Flock contracts and urged the county to do the same.

Opposed Item 44, criticizing the board for placing the contract extension on the consent calendar.

Expressed strong support for the Flock cameras as an essential tool for police to stop and solve crime.

Spoke on behalf of East Bay Sanctuary Covenant in opposition to the Flock contract, warning of risks to immigrant residents.

Supported license plate readers, citing successful crime reduction outcomes in Fremont.

Argued against the Flock contract, stating that surveillance tech benefits corporate entities while aiding government overreach.

Urged a 'no' vote on Item 44, advocating for investment in community-based outreach rather than AI tech tools.

Spoke in support of the Sheriff's Office and Flock cameras, highlighting crime impacts on unincorporated communities.

Opposed Flock cameras, arguing that true community safety comes from investing in housing, food access, and infrastructure.

Used a home camera analogy to illustrate privacy risks associated with third-party data storage on Flock servers.

Opposed Item 44, noting that expanding surveillance contradicts the board's recent sanctuary policies.

Supported the Flock contract as a practical tool helping law enforcement solve crimes in underserved areas.

Expressed support for Flock cameras, emphasizing that citizens and business owners rely on technology to combat crime.

Expressed strong support for Item 44, citing the Sheriff's statement on violent crime reduction.

Strongly opposed the Flock contract extension, arguing it undermines county sanctuary policies.

Cited Mountain View's recent decision to cancel its Flock contract after discovering data sharing with federal agencies.

Expressed opposition to Item 44, arguing that surveillance tech does not effectively ensure community safety.

Opposed the expansion of Flock, noting pending lawsuits against other cities for license plate reader use.

Strongly opposed the Flock contract extension, warning of disproportionate targeting of marginalized residents.

Expressed concern as a preschool teacher about student families and urged ending the Flock contract.

Urged immediate cancellation of the Flock contract, citing risks to immigrants and domestic violence survivors.